Le Centre Alexandrin d'Étude
des Amphores
logo cnrs
CEAlex - USR 3134
Présentation
Introduction
Amphores
Amphorae
Anses timbrées
Stamped Handles
Fouilles
Digs
Publications ChronAmphora Bibliothèque CAEA
CAEA Library
Ressources en ligne
On-line resources
Plan du site
Site plan
Mise à jour
Update

Anses d'amphores timbrées

Méthodologie
Construction de la base de données
Définition des matrices
Timbres Rhodiens
Autres productions
Catalogue des matrices des timbres des eponymes rhodiens

 

Definition of matrices   

To establish the matrices of each impression, the system proposed by Jean-Yves Empereur* has been taken as a model. According to this system, all the impressions are formulated and numbered depending on the inscribed information on the stamp. This system can be considered as a kind of "open system" to every new matrix type which will be found later. V. Grace, during her studies on the matrices, gave a number to Rhodian eponyms and fabricants in alphabetical order. But any new eponym or fabricant name caused a problem when adding them into the existing list. A similar sort of difficulty occurs for Knidian stamps. The existing KT numbers are in order at the beginning in an alphabetical order according to the names of the fabricants and then the magistrates whose names are associated with the fabricants, but when new types were found, the necessity of giving a new KT number caused confusion and made finding the matrix in question difficult. For example, a newly found stamp of a fabricant whose name begins with alpha ends with a number like KT 2437. The new system proposed here permits the integration of all new matrices of any origin which will be found in the future.

The abbreviations in the matrices are used to indicate the following full words:

R: Rhodian
K: Knidian
KO: Koan
X: Chian
X-lag: Chian Lagynos
NIK: Nikandros Group
E: Eponym
F: Fabricant
D: Duoviri
Ph. Phrourarchos
TS: Timbre Secondaire (Secondary Stamp)
MC: Matrice Complementaire (Complementary Matrix)
M: Month-name

The matrices are identified according to any difference seen on the impression, such as the characteristics of the letters, the organization of the stamp depending on the division of the words (names, prepositions, titles, month-names), number of lines, devices, place of the device, form of the stamp, measurement of the stamp, inscription errors, abbreviations, space between letters or after/before words etc.

As seen above, the matrix numbers do not cause any complexity. To get more detailed information about a certain matrix, one should see the form of it in the database or in another version of the stamp database, which will be presented below, containing the best photos of every matrix belonging to eponyms or fabricants with and/or without month-names. 

For our studies in Alexandria, another type of database containing only the photographs of matrices has also been prepared (fig. 7). In fact, it is a simple card system applied in the computer with Filemaker Pro 8.5. For every eponym and fabricant with different month-names and without a month-name, a form is created. In the forms, one can find the best photos or the rubbings of each matrix with the indication of the matrix number and the inventory number of the stamp. This allows the researchers to see all the matrices of a certain eponym/fabricant with a certain month-name/without a month-name together in need of comparison, identification or restoration of their impressions (or matrices).

Fig 7


* EMPEREUR, GUIMIER-SORBETS 1986, p. 129.
collection